[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[SEC508] Session Timeouts and 1194.22(p)
- To: <sec508@trace.wisc.edu>
- Subject: [SEC508] Session Timeouts and 1194.22(p)
- From: "Rowland, Brian" <Brian_Rowland@sra.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:26:23 -0400
- List-archive: <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailarchive/sec508/>
- Sender: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu
- Thread-index: AcpXO15yKMIzlbCjR36QbsEd09Ze3g==
- Thread-topic: Session Timeouts and 1194.22(p)
|
I’ve been wondering about session inactivity timeouts
and 1194.22(p). Based on a very small amount of research I’ve done,
the industry approach seems to be to assert support for 22(p) and note the
presence of a session inactivity timeout in the remarks field of the product
VPAT. Have any agencies put forth a position on this? I
would not consider silent session expirations an example of supporting the
technical standard, but the ‘wisdom of the crowd’ seems to imply I
am not in the majority. Thanks, Brian Rowland User Interface Developer SRA International, Inc. |
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [SEC508] Session Timeouts and 1194.22(p)
- From: "Baquis, David " <baquis@Access-Board.gov>
- RE: [SEC508] Session Timeouts and 1194.22(p)
- Prev by Date: [SEC508] Accessibility to InDesign CS4 and PDF?
- Next by Date: RE: [SEC508] Session Timeouts and 1194.22(p)
- Previous by thread: [SEC508] Accessibility to InDesign CS4 and PDF?
- Next by thread: RE: [SEC508] Session Timeouts and 1194.22(p)
- Index(es):