[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [SEC508] Flash Games test
- To: "'Andrew Kirkpatrick'" <akirkpat@adobe.com>, <blindwebbers@yahoo.com>, <gui-talk@nfbnet.org>, <sec508@trace.wisc.edu>
- Subject: RE: [SEC508] Flash Games test
- From: "Sailesh Panchang" <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:08:56 -0400
- In-reply-to: AAAAACulfaKdo8tKhie0RybgKNYkVSsA
- List-archive: <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailarchive/sec508/>
- Sender: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu
- Thread-index: AcbGGUx7DNsN8iJuR8iVPjHsmccrfQAohV9Q
To Net Systems, Andrew et al, Good job Net Systems. JAWS 7.0 and 7.10 both worked with the applications but 7.0 seemed to be able to read entire text of the instructions unlike 7.10. Losing focus was certainly an issue... after selecting a right/ wrong letter the focus should go to the word or to the alphabet following the one just selected. In 1.1 I liked the output being read first letter is blank, second letter is N, etc. WinEyes 5.5 worked well but it is unfortunate that the shortcut keys defined work only for JAWS. With JAWS I also noted that the Home button did not seem to work after completing a game and I could not go back to select another category. WinEyes did not pose this problem. And yes the audio feedback in example 2 is better. Andrew I thought the term Rich Internet Applications is used for DHTML/AJAX type of applications . A Flash application is not RIA, right? Sailesh Panchang Senior Accessibility Engineer Deque Systems Inc. (www.deque.com) 11130 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite #140, Reston VA 20191 Phone: 703-225-0380 (ext 105) E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com -----Original Message----- From: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu [mailto:sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu] On Behalf Of Andrew Kirkpatrick Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 2:32 PM To: blindwebbers@yahoo.com; gui-talk@nfbnet.org; sec508@trace.wisc.edu Subject: [SEC508] Flash Games test Hi, Net Systems Solutions (http://www.n-syst.com) has created a couple of versions of a Flash game. I'm interested in gathering some opinions about which version people prefer, and why. I'll share any results from this non-scientific study -- the general idea behind this is that rich internet applications are challenging to make accessible, in part because we need better information about what screen reader and keyboard users prefer. Example 1.1: http://www.n-syst.com/hangman1.htm Example 1.2: http://www.n-syst.com/Hangman2.html I wrote this up on Adobe's Accessibility Blog - feel free to send comments to this list or add comments to the Blog entry. http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility/ http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility/2006/08/two_accessible_flash_games_ whi.html Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Corporate Accessibility Engineering Lead Adobe Systems akirkpatrick@adobe.com _______________________________________________ SEC508 mailing list SEC508@trace.wisc.edu http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/sec508
- Prev by Date: RE: [SEC508] Flash Games test
- Next by Date: RE: [SEC508] Flash Games test
- Previous by thread: RE: [SEC508] Flash Games test
- Next by thread: RE: [SEC508] Flash Games test
- Index(es):