[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [SEC508] Flash Games test
- To: <sec508@trace.wisc.edu>
- Subject: RE: [SEC508] Flash Games test
- From: "Jonathan Avila" <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:36:54 -0400
- In-reply-to: <53744A0A1D995C459E975F971E17F56401277802@namail4.corp.adobe.com>
- List-archive: <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailarchive/sec508/>
- Organization: SSB+BART Group
- Reply-to: <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Sender: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu
- Thread-index: AcbGGUx7DNsN8iJuR8iVPjHsmccrfQAlftug
Andrew and others, I also liked version 1.2 better. However, both have limitations. The biggest issues I saw in 1.2 were that when you correctly answered a letter, focus did not move to the word or to the line that describes how many characters match your correct guess. In addition, there were no known hotkeys to jump to different places. For example, I would like hotkeys to jump to the word, and some for the menu buttons. Because the actual word is a graphic, I found the best way to read it was via the control+arrow keys. This allows JAWS to announce each "blank" instead of hearing b l a n k with the arrow keys. JAWS 7.1 worked well for me. The only issue I ran into was JAWS started clicking on my taskbar when the letter I was focused on in VC mode was off screen. This example certain brings to light how important 1194.31 Functional performance criteria is in something being compliant. Jonathan -----Original Message----- From: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu [mailto:sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu] On Behalf Of Andrew Kirkpatrick Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 2:32 PM To: blindwebbers@yahoo.com; gui-talk@nfbnet.org; sec508@trace.wisc.edu Subject: [SEC508] Flash Games test Hi, Net Systems Solutions (http://www.n-syst.com) has created a couple of versions of a Flash game. I'm interested in gathering some opinions about which version people prefer, and why. I'll share any results from this non-scientific study -- the general idea behind this is that rich internet applications are challenging to make accessible, in part because we need better information about what screen reader and keyboard users prefer. Example 1.1: http://www.n-syst.com/hangman1.htm Example 1.2: http://www.n-syst.com/Hangman2.html I wrote this up on Adobe's Accessibility Blog - feel free to send comments to this list or add comments to the Blog entry. http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility/ http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility/2006/08/two_accessible_flash_games_ whi.html Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Corporate Accessibility Engineering Lead Adobe Systems akirkpatrick@adobe.com _______________________________________________ SEC508 mailing list SEC508@trace.wisc.edu http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/sec508
- References:
- [SEC508] Flash Games test
- From: "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- [SEC508] Flash Games test
- Prev by Date: RE: [SEC508] Flash Games test
- Next by Date: RE: [SEC508] Flash Games test
- Previous by thread: [SEC508] Flash Games test
- Next by thread: Re: [SEC508] Flash Games test
- Index(es):