[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[SEC508] Web-based training and meeting software
- To: sec508@trace.wisc.edu
- Subject: [SEC508] Web-based training and meeting software
- From: Lynnette <labanning@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:00:01 -0400
- List-archive: <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailarchive/sec508/>
- Sender: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
Good afternoon.
We are looking for a web-based training and meeting application and have
come up against several accessibility issues.
The training department wants to use Macromedia Breeze, which has
several features all on the same screen. 1) simultaneous video with
audio (the presenter), 2) a chat area for all participants, and 3) a
presentation area where the presenter, or other attendees, can share
applications, documents, or web pages. Unfortunately, as may be
expected, this product is deemed not in compliance with the Section 508
standards.
It appears that TTY and relay conference captioning, or similar
solution, may enable a person who is deaf or hard of hearing to
participate with this software. The inaccessibility is most aggregious
to the blind and low vision community who would have to follow in 3
different mediums, namely: 1) the presenter; 2) chat area; and 3)
presentation area.
For the training use of this software, if no accessible application
contains these features, would you believe this falls under the 1194.3
Fundamental Alteration category and perhaps offering one-on-one training
with those requiring an alternative method would be acceptable, or even preferable?
To complicate matters, even if that is acceptable for a training
scenario, it seems to me that it may have a different slant, as far as
fundamental alteration is concerned, if it is rather a participatory
meeting that is being conducted online in this manner. A one-on-one
alternative would not be an equivalent solution, of course, in that
case.
I understand WebEx is supposed to be accessible. We have a request in to have the vendor contact
us and to send us their VPAT if they have one. Has anyone heard of this? Is it truly accessible?
I would be most appreciative to learn of known web-based applications
that are considered to be 508-compliant and would also appreciate
opinions on the applicability of 1194.3 if no accessible solution
exists.
Thank you!
Respectfully,
Lynnette Banning
Section 508 Accessibility Consultant
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/391 - Release Date: 7/18/2006
- Prev by Date: RE: [SEC508] Does .31 always apply?
- Next by Date: [SEC508] RE: SEC508 digest, Vol 1 #359 - 1 msg
- Previous by thread: [SEC508] Watchfire evaluation tool
- Next by thread: [SEC508] RE: SEC508 digest, Vol 1 #359 - 1 msg
- Index(es):