[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[SEC508] RE: [SEC508] Re: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- To: "'Giorgio Brajnik'" <giorgio@dimi.uniud.it>, "'Peter Korn'" <Peter.Korn@sun.com>
- Subject: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] Re: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- From: "Jim Tobias" <tobias@inclusive.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 09:52:03 -0500
- Cc: <sec508@trace.wisc.edu>
- In-reply-to: <b00f67220512170606scf7ea8bx7f5cc85738ad5413@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailarchive/sec508/>
- Sender: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu
- Thread-index: AcYDE4u4KdtYQnfiS8iIbLX9cO0OTAABaT9A
Yeah, this should be in the User Agent
Guidelines.
Perhaps its absence is a function of
the almost-total focus on screen readers....
***********
Jim Tobias
Inclusive
Technologies
tobias@inclusive.com
+732.441.0831
v/tty
www.inclusive.com
I think Peter is right: using only color to distinguish visited and unvisited links is a violation of the (i) par.
From: Giorgio Brajnik [mailto:giorgio@dimi.uniud.it]
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 9:07 AM
To: Peter Korn
Cc: sec508@trace.wisc.edu
Subject: [SEC508] Re: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
Fortunately there are simple solutions, like using an appropriate CSS style to change the link decoration (assuming the link is text), likea:visited {border-bottom:1px dashed}Best regards,
--
Giorgio Brajnik
______________________________________________________________________
Dip. di Matematica e Informatica | voice: +39 (0432) 55.8445
Universitą di Udine | fax: +39 (0432) 55.8499
Via delle Scienze, 206 | email: giorgio@dimi.uniud.it
Loc. Rizzi -- 33100 Udine -- ITALY | http://www.dimi.uniud.it/giorgio
On 12/16/05, Peter Korn <Peter.Korn@sun.com> wrote:Greetings,
Sorry if this has come up before and been discussed...
In a conversation earlier today about §1194.21(i) "Color coding shall not be
used as the only means of conveying information, indicating an action,
prompting a response, or distinguishing a visual element" the question of
visited/non-visited links in a web page came up. The default
behavior/convention for this has been a color change of the link. Clearly one
can change the default behavior (especially with CSS); but...
I did a search of the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines, and didn't see a
reference to the question of link color.
Any thoughts?
Peter Korn
Accessibility Architect,
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
_______________________________________________
SEC508 mailing list
SEC508@trace.wisc.edu
http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/sec508
- References:
- [SEC508] Re: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation wit h visited/non-visited links by default?
- From: Giorgio Brajnik <giorgio@dimi.uniud.it>
- [SEC508] Re: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation wit h visited/non-visited links by default?
- Prev by Date: [SEC508] Re: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation wit h visited/non-visited links by default?
- Next by Date: [SEC508] alt attributes using Firefox on two sites
- Previous by thread: [SEC508] Re: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation wit h visited/non-visited links by default?
- Next by thread: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- Index(es):