[SEC508] Re: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation wit h visited/non-visited links by default?

[Giorgio Brajnik <giorgio@dimi.uniud.it>]

I think Peter is right: using only color to distinguish visited and unvisited links is a violation of the (i) par.
Fortunately there are simple solutions, like using an appropriate CSS style to change the link decoration (assuming the link is text), like
a:visited {border-bottom:1px dashed}
Best regards,

-- 
        Giorgio Brajnik
______________________________________________________________________
Dip. di Matematica e Informatica   | voice: +39 (0432) 
55.8445
Universitą di Udine                | fax:   +39 (0432) 55.8499
Via delle Scienze, 206             | email: giorgio@dimi.uniud.it
Loc. Rizzi -- 33100 Udine -- ITALY | 
http://www.dimi.uniud.it/giorgio

On 12/16/05, Peter Korn <Peter.Korn@sun.com> wrote:

Greetings,

Sorry if this has come up before and been discussed...

In a conversation earlier today about §1194.21(i) "Color coding shall not be
used as the only means of conveying information, indicating an action,
prompting a response, or distinguishing a visual element" the question of
visited/non-visited links in a web page came up.  The default
behavior/convention for this has been a color change of the link.  Clearly one
can change the default behavior (especially with CSS); but...

I did a search of the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines, and didn't see a
reference to the question of link color.


Any thoughts?


Peter Korn
Accessibility Architect,
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

_______________________________________________
SEC508 mailing list
SEC508@trace.wisc.edu
http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/sec508