[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- To: <sec508@trace.wisc.edu>
- Subject: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- From: "Jonathan Avila" <jon@bartsite.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:06:27 -0500
- In-reply-to: <43A23437.2000902@sun.com>
- List-archive: <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailarchive/sec508/>
- Sender: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu
- Thread-index: AcYB8QF3JYbvkZBCSbO7lSEdOSP9hgAixZ9Q
As long as guidelines establish for use of user defined style sheets this is not an issue. Jonathan -----Original Message----- From: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu [mailto:sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu] On Behalf Of Peter Korn Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:28 PM To: sec508@trace.wisc.edu Subject: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default? Greetings, Sorry if this has come up before and been discussed... In a conversation earlier today about §1194.21(i) "Color coding shall not be used as the only means of conveying information, indicating an action, prompting a response, or distinguishing a visual element" the question of visited/non-visited links in a web page came up. The default behavior/convention for this has been a color change of the link. Clearly one can change the default behavior (especially with CSS); but... I did a search of the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines, and didn't see a reference to the question of link color. Any thoughts? Peter Korn Accessibility Architect, Sun Microsystems, Inc. _______________________________________________ SEC508 mailing list SEC508@trace.wisc.edu http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/sec508
- References:
- [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- From: Peter Korn <Peter.Korn@Sun.COM>
- [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- Prev by Date: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- Next by Date: [SEC508] Re: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation wit h visited/non-visited links by default?
- Previous by thread: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- Next by thread: [SEC508] Re: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation wit h visited/non-visited links by default?
- Index(es):