[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- To: "Barrett, Don" <Don.Barrett@ed.gov>
- Subject: Re: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- From: Peter Korn <Peter.Korn@Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:38:25 -0800
- Cc: sec508@trace.wisc.edu, "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
- List-archive: <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailarchive/sec508/>
- References: <4313AD4429551F4595A8A414A660C75F06CE35FE@wdcrobe2m05.ed.gov>
- Sender: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.1)Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
Hi Don,
My §1194.21(i) concern with visited/non-visited links has nothing to do with screen readers, which have a variety of ways of obtaining that information. It is with non-AT users who have color blindness issues.Screen readers are very good at telling the user that a link has been visited. If they are just tracking color changes, you are right in that this may be an issue under 1194.21[i]. If, on the other hand, the browser is using another means to inform the screen reader, or to put it another way, if the screen reader is tracking a flag or other means, then it should be ok.
Regards,
Peter Korn
Accessibility Architect,
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Don Barrett
Section 508 Coordinator
U.S. Department of Education
(202)-205-8245
don.barrett@ed.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu [mailto:sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu]On
Behalf Of Peter Korn
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:28 PM
To: sec508@trace.wisc.edu
Subject: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links
by default?
Greetings,
Sorry if this has come up before and been discussed...
In a conversation earlier today about §1194.21(i) "Color coding shall not be used as the only means of conveying information, indicating an action, prompting a response, or distinguishing a visual element" the question of visited/non-visited links in a web page came up. The default behavior/convention for this has been a color change of the link. Clearly one can change the default behavior (especially with CSS); but...
I did a search of the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines, and didn't see a reference to the question of link color.
Any thoughts?
Peter Korn
Accessibility Architect,
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
_______________________________________________
SEC508 mailing list
SEC508@trace.wisc.edu
http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/sec508
_______________________________________________
SEC508 mailing list
SEC508@trace.wisc.edu
http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/sec508
- References:
- [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- From: "Barrett, Don" <Don.Barrett@ed.gov>
- [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- Prev by Date: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- Next by Date: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- Previous by thread: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- Next by thread: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- Index(es):