[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- To: sec508@trace.wisc.edu
- Subject: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- From: Peter Korn <Peter.Korn@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:27:51 -0800
- List-archive: <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailarchive/sec508/>
- Sender: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.1)Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
Greetings,
Sorry if this has come up before and been discussed...
In a conversation earlier today about §1194.21(i) "Color coding shall not be used as the only means of conveying information, indicating an action, prompting a response, or distinguishing a visual element" the question of visited/non-visited links in a web page came up. The default behavior/convention for this has been a color change of the link. Clearly one can change the default behavior (especially with CSS); but...
I did a search of the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines, and didn't see a reference to the question of link color.
Any thoughts?
Peter Korn
Accessibility Architect,
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
- Follow-Ups:
- [SEC508] Re: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation wit h visited/non-visited links by default?
- From: Giorgio Brajnik <giorgio@dimi.uniud.it>
- [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- From: "Jonathan Avila" <jon@bartsite.com>
- [SEC508] Re: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation wit h visited/non-visited links by default?
- Prev by Date: [SEC508] Metrics/Cost Estimates
- Next by Date: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- Previous by thread: [SEC508] Metrics/Cost Estimates
- Next by thread: [SEC508] RE: [SEC508] §1194.21(i) violation with visited/non-visited links by default?
- Index(es):