[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [SEC508] Two questions
- To: "'Jim Tobias'" <tobias@inclusive.com>, <sec508@trace.wisc.edu>
- Subject: RE: [SEC508] Two questions
- From: "Erika Noll Webb" <ewebb@quintusdesign.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:59:51 -0700
- In-reply-to: <200511112340.jABNeIxP006466@mx1.cae.wisc.edu>
- List-archive: <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailarchive/sec508/>
- Sender: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu
- Thread-index: AcXnEfVaCmM8jaluRZS653ZvzTYuHAABXf6AAIkiTaA=
While I'm worried about starting a fire storm with this one, I'm facing some
interesting issues on an evaluation I'm doing right now. Normally, I'm
working with a development team in process, but now I'm working with a group
that needs a fast hit 508 review. There are some things that I think
technically pass, but aren't great. For example, in a particular window,
everything on the screen is accessible from the keyboard, but the order
isn't the same as the visual representation. All the elements that are
supposed to be clustered together (e.g. like a series of radio buttons), but
the order of the options isn't the same.
How do you approach a client on things like this? Technically it passes,
but I want them to fix it later. I remember another "technical pass" issue
came up recently and I'm curious now what others do. My recollection was
that someone (maybe Don?) said that he'd pass something, but I wonder if you
go back and tell them it should still be fixed later.
Regards,
Erika
Erika Noll Webb, Ph.D.
ewebb@quintusdesign.com
www.quintusdesign.com
office: 303.449.5020
mobile: 720.319.2145
fax: 303.449.7045
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [SEC508] Two questions
- From: "Jim Tobias" <tobias@inclusive.com>
- RE: [SEC508] Two questions
- References:
- RE: [SEC508] Two questions
- From: "Jim Tobias" <tobias@inclusive.com>
- RE: [SEC508] Two questions
- Prev by Date: [SEC508] 508 Architect opens a no-holds-barred discussion on accessibility issues
- Next by Date: RE: [SEC508] Two questions
- Previous by thread: RE: [SEC508] Two questions
- Next by thread: RE: [SEC508] Two questions
- Index(es):