[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [SEC508] 508 Issues...
- To: "'Tammy Mosey'" <tmosey@mntntp.com>, <sec508@trace.wisc.edu>
- Subject: RE: [SEC508] 508 Issues...
- From: "Mark D. Urban" <docurban@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:22:21 -0500
- In-reply-to: <f2996f3ff2778ef851fa77cb33bc9260@mntntp.com>
- List-archive: <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailarchive/sec508/>
- Sender: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu
- Thread-index: AcXglkNfvlWswOARTkaLUjizfgnXUQAAyvtw
|
OK – some clarification for Tammy: The confusion is that there are Technical Standards (Subpart B of
the reg) which must be met. Some of these require a characteristic: e.g. 1192.22(a)
A text equivalent for every non-text element shall be provided (e.g.,
via "alt", "longdesc", or in
element content). For this one, you use whatever is the standard
best practice of the technology in question and insert the characteristic. (for XHTML,
this would be the W3C spec ALT attribute)
Testing is simply identifying that the attribute is there and conveys
the information in the non-text element. Some of Subpart B requires a Function: e.g. 1192.21(i) When
electronic forms are used, the form shall allow people using assistive
technology to access the information, field elements, and functionality
required for completion and submission of the form, including all directions
and cues. These standards require that it work with assistive
technology (such as - BUT NOT ONLY
- Magic, JAWS, Zoomtext, Does that help? Note I haven’t gotten into Subpart
C – the Functional Performance Criteria. That’s a lesson for another day
;-) Regards, -Mark D. Urban 919-395-8513 (cell) Chair, North Carolina Governor's Advocacy Council for Persons
with Disabilities Keep up with the latest in worldwide accessibility at (http://www.icdri.org/) From:
sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu [mailto:sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu] On Behalf Of Tammy Mosey
|
- References:
- [SEC508] 508 Issues...
- From: Tammy Mosey <tmosey@mntntp.com>
- [SEC508] 508 Issues...
- Prev by Date: RE: [SEC508] question
- Next by Date: RE: [SEC508] 508 Issues...
- Previous by thread: [SEC508] 508 Issues...
- Next by thread: RE: [SEC508] 508 Issues...
- Index(es):