[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [SEC508] RE: question on 508 issues
- To: mburks952@worldnet.att.net, "'Tammy Mosey'" <tmosey@mntntp.com>
- Subject: RE: [SEC508] RE: question on 508 issues
- From: "Dwight H. Barbour" <dbs@dbsolutions.net>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:49:50 -0500
- Cc: sec508@trace.wisc.edu
- In-reply-to: <20051103154149.DCCCC6C2814@mx1.messagingengine.com>
- List-archive: <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailarchive/sec508/>
- References: <20051103154149.DCCCC6C2814@mx1.messagingengine.com>
- Sender: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu
The buyaccessible.gov website seemed pretty useless for purchasing of web development.. It seems to cover 508, except products which fall in subsection 1194.22. On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:41:45 -0500, "Michael R. Burks" <mburks952@worldnet.att.net> said: > You might want to take a look at the Buy Accessible site and use the > Wizard > to get a little better idea of what Section 508 is all about. > > It is located at: http://www.buyaccessible.gov/ > > You also might want to take a look at http://www.section508.gov/ which > also > has valuable information about Section 508 > > Michael Burks > > -----Original Message----- > From: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu [mailto:sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu] On > Behalf Of Dwight H. Barbour > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 10:36 AM > To: Tammy Mosey > Cc: sec508@trace.wisc.edu > Subject: Re: [SEC508] RE: question on 508 issues > > Section 508 is not about a specific OS, hardware, or software. > > It is a set of standards to follow in your development process. > > If you following xHTML with the 508 tag and attribute guidelines, your > site will be compliant. > > No where in the 508 regs does it state that you need to be concerned > with Magic Magnifier or JAWS. > > On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 09:53:02 -0500, "Tammy Mosey" <tmosey@mntntp.com> > said: > > RE: 508 standards > > > > I do testing of software and for 508 issues. I have a few questions > > on compliance. actually, would like some input and your thoughts. > > > > I use Magic magnifier. I set the magnifier to "LENS" view, the lens > > view should tab to all the links on the page. But it will not. Some > > would consider this a 508 issue. Another would say, all they have to > > do is put it to "FULL" view in the magnifier. > > So my question is: As long as one has access to the page either thru > > JAWS and MAGIC is this good enough, considering we do not know what > > kind of OS they are using? If magic wont tab to links in the lens view, > > the user can use the full view? Is this acceptable? > > We do follow standards where I work, but sometimes things like: JAWS > > wont read all the acronyms, or tabbing wont work on certain pages with > > Magic, Magic wont tab to navigation bar.... are these major concerns? > > Some say "let it go", some say " everything needs fixed" > > Where do you draw the line on standards ? I think everything should > > be fixed, even if JAWS reads a few words wrong. > > Is it ok the tabbing doesn't work on a few pages? or if MAGIC wont > > tab to the links.? AM I being to "harse" trying to fix every little > > detail? > > > > * I was put in charge of 508 standards for the Company. I am looking > > for a happy medium between testers and developers. > > > > Thanks for your input, > > Tammy M. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tammy M. Mosey > > Software Tester 1 > > Quality Control > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SEC508 mailing list > > SEC508@trace.wisc.edu > > http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/sec508 > -- > Dwight H. Barbour > .NET Community Builder > Section 508 and ASP.NET Educator and Developer > dbs@dbsolutions.net > > _______________________________________________ > SEC508 mailing list > SEC508@trace.wisc.edu > http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/sec508 > -- Dwight H. Barbour .NET Community Builder Section 508 and ASP.NET Educator and Developer dbs@dbsolutions.net
- Prev by Date: RE: [SEC508] RE: question on 508 issues
- Next by Date: RE: [SEC508] RE: question on 508 issues
- Previous by thread: RE: [SEC508] RE: question on 508 issues
- Next by thread: [SEC508] question
- Index(es):