First Last Prev Next    No search results available

Issue 1004 - Clarifications for 1.1, level 1 criterion
: Clarifications for 1.1, level 1 criterion

Description:   Opened: 2004-08-20 17:28 CDT 
Ian Jacobs writes:

1.1, Level 1 SC:

   - a, b, and c are not mutually exclusive. Are several text
     equivalents required if all are true?

   - "non-text content" is not a closed definition and therefore
     cannot be tested. I think this term needs a much stronger
     definition.

   - I don't know how "real-time" and "not time-sensitive"
     relate. Please clarify.

   - In 5., I don't think the distinction between "providing a 
     substitute" and "providing a link to a substitute" is
     significant. If, in general, I cannot satisfy the
     requirements by providing a set of linked resources, then
     I think that's a larger problem.
Working Group Notes:
Response to Reviewer:

Note: Use the commit button above to make minor changes to the working group notes or response to reviewer fields. For status changes or other edits to the issue, modify the fields below as needed.

Status: CLOSED ACCEPTED
: Guidelines (WCAG 2.0)
1.1
: 2004 - July 30 (TR)
: Other public-comment
: C2 none
: ---
Assigned To:
:
: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/p...
:
: Ian_Jacobs
:
:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2004-08-20 17:28 CDT by
Modified: 2005-12-19 15:07 CST (History)

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Note

You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.

Description wendy chisholm 2004-08-20 17:28:20 CDT 
Ian Jacobs writes:

1.1, Level 1 SC:

   - a, b, and c are not mutually exclusive. Are several text
     equivalents required if all are true?

   - "non-text content" is not a closed definition and therefore
     cannot be tested. I think this term needs a much stronger
     definition.

   - I don't know how "real-time" and "not time-sensitive"
     relate. Please clarify.

   - In 5., I don't think the distinction between "providing a 
     substitute" and "providing a link to a substitute" is
     significant. If, in general, I cannot satisfy the
     requirements by providing a set of linked resources, then
     I think that's a larger problem.
Comment 1 Ben Caldwell 2004-09-14 15:40:56 CDT 
Related proposal submitted to list:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JulSep/0651.html
Comment 2 Ben Caldwell 2004-09-28 15:21:18 CDT 
Proposal discussed in the September 16, 2004 telecon

resolved to include revisions to guideline 1.1 based on proposal, revising item
#5 to read:

Non-text content that does not provide information, functionality, sensory
experience and is neither multimedia nor time-dependent interactive content, is
marked such that it can be ignored by assistive technology.
Comment 3 John Slatin 2005-01-10 14:54:44 CST 
The phrase "text alternatives" should *not* be hyphenated. See 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004OctDec/0002.html#start
Comment 4 Ben Caldwell 2005-01-13 14:27:32 CST 
Wendy writes:

   Proposals from September should address the issues. Were incorporated
   into 19 November draft.

   Propose: close the issue.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005JanMar/0067.html
Comment 5 Ben Caldwell 2005-01-13 15:29:59 CST 
Discussed at the January 13, 2005 teleconference:

agreed. close issue.
Comment 6 Ben Caldwell 2005-12-19 15:07:37 CST 
Closing all issues changed to "VERIFIED" prior to 01 July 2005. Following the
30
June public WD, all reviewers received a personalized email describing how
their
issues had been addressed.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available